A Model to Transfer Technology and Technical Knowledge in Auto Parts Manufacturers
Resumen
Background: Regarding the high demands of auto parts manufacturers to utilize new technologies to develop and grow competitiveness and produce products in the market, there is an urgent need for successful technology transfer to the company. In this regard, a suitable model for appropriate transfer of technology and technical knowledge is required to succeed and be effective in order to facilitate the maximum adaptation between the demand and operational dimensions in this industry.
Objective: In this study, a model was proposed to evaluate the success of technology and technical knowledge transfer in auto parts manufacturers.
Method: To this end, the factors affecting the success of technology transfer were first collected according to previous studies, and then an exploratory factor analysis questionnaire was developed to classify and screen these factors in the form of a conceptual model.
Results: In the study, 361 personnel and experts from auto parts manufacturers participated, and Cronbach's alpha coefficient >0.7 was set to measure the reliability of the questionnaires. Finally, exploratory factor analysis method was used to develop the model. Afterward, according to the proposed model, a confirmatory factor analysis questionnaire was prepared and filled in by the same statistical population, who were working in auto parts manufacturers. After examining the normality of the sample and the reliability of the questionnaire, structural equations were designed in the form of confirmation structures for the model. Exploratory factor analysis was also used to confirm and test the model.
Conclusion: The findings indicated that organizational index, adaptability, and technology utilization and absorption had the greatest impacts on the success of technology transfer, respectively.
Citas
Alem, Y., & Broussard, N. H. (2018). The impact of safety nets on technology adoption: A difference-in-differences analysis. Agricultural economics, 49(1), 13-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.12392
Audretsch, D. B., Lehmann, E. E., Paleari, S., & Vismara, S. (2016). Entrepreneurial finance and technology transfer. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 41(1), 1–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-014-9381-8
Battaglia, D., Landoni, P., & Rizzitelli, F. (2017). Organizational structures for external growth of University Technology Transfer Offices: An explorative analysis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 123, 45–56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.06.017
Bozeman, B., Rimes, H., & Youtie, J. (2015). The evolving state-of-the-art in technology transfer research: Revisiting the contingent effectiveness model. Research Policy, 44(1), 34–49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.06.008
Cartaxo, R. M., & Godinho, M. M. (2017). How institutional nature and available resources determine the performance of technology transfer offices. Industry and Innovation, 24(7), 713–734. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2016.1264068
Cinar, O., Altuntas, S., & Alan, M. A. (2021). Technology transfer and its impact on innovation and firm performance: empirical evidence from Turkish export companies. Kybernetes, 50(7), 2179–2207. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-12-2019-0828 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/K-12-2019-0828
da Silva, V. L., Kovaleski, J. L., & Pagani, R. N. (2021). Fundamental elements in Technology Transfer: an in-depth analysis. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 34(2), 1–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2021.1894328
de Moraes, L., Garcia, R., Ensslin, L., da Conceição, M. J., & de Carvalho, S. M. (2010). The multicriteria analysis for construction of benchmarkers to support the Clinical Engineering in the Healthcare Technology Management. European Journal of Operational Research, 200(2), 607–615. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2009.01.018
Del Giudice, M., Carayannis, E. G., & Maggioni, V. (2017). Global knowledge intensive enterprises and international technology transfer: emerging perspectives from a quadruple helix environment. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 42(2), 229–235. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-016-9496-1
Garner, B. R., Zehner, M., Roosa, M. R., Martino, S., Gotham, H. J., Ball, E. L., Stilen, P.,, Speck, K., Vandersloot, D., Rieckmann, T. R., Chaple, M., Martin, E. G., Kaiser, D., & Ford, J. H. (2017). Testing the implementation and sustainment facilitation (ISF) strategy as an effective adjunct to the Addiction Technology Transfer Center (ATTC) strategy: study protocol for a cluster randomized trial. Addiction science & clinical practice, 12(1), 1–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13722-017-0096-7
Hill, A. M. (2018). Authentic Learning and Technology Education. In M. J. de Vries (Ed.), Handbook of Technology Education (pp. 473–487). Springer International Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44687-5_36
Kalaitzandonakes, N., Carayannis, E. G., Grigoroudis, E., & Rozakis, S. (2018). Innovation and technology transfer in agriculture: Concluding comments. In N. Kalaitzandonakes, E. Carayannis, E. Grigoroudis, & S. Rozakis (eds), From agriscience to agribusiness (pp. 483–490). Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67958-7_24
Klempin, S., & Karp, M. M. (2018). Leadership for Transformative Change: Lessons From Technology-Mediated Reform in Broad-Access Colleges. The Journal of Higher Education, 89(1), 81–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2017.1341754 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2017.1341754
Koutsouris, A. (2018). Role of extension in agricultural technology transfer: A critical review. In N. Kalaitzandonakes, E. Carayannis, E. Grigoroudis, & S. Rozakis (eds), From agriscience to agribusiness (pp. 337–359). Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67958-7_16
Liguori, G., Belfiore, P., D’Amora, M., Liguori, R., & Plebani, M. (2017). The principles of health technology assessment in laboratory medicine. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM), 55(1), 32–37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2016-0371
Liu, R., Yang, J., & Zhang, F. (2021). Managing technology transfer between coopetitive firms: the roles of coopetition, asset specificity and justice. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 36(5), 765–781. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBIM-10-2019-0462 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JBIM-10-2019-0462
Mohammadi, N., Heidary Dahooie, J., & Khajevand, M. (2021). A hybrid approach for identifying and prioritizing critical success factors in technology transfer projects (case study: diesel locomotive manufacturing). Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print). https://doi.org/10.1108/JEDT-07-2021-0345 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JEDT-07-2021-0345
O’kane, C., Mangematin, V., Geoghegan, W., & Fitzgerald, C. (2015). University technology transfer offices: The search for identity to build legitimacy. Research Policy, 44(2), 421–437. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.08.003
Park, H., Cho, B., Hwang, I. S., & Lee, J. R. (2018). Study on the SDN-IP–based solution of well-known bottleneck problems in private sector of national R&E network for big data transfer. Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience, 30(1), e4365. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cpe.4365
Rjoub, H., Aga, M., Abu Alrub, A., & Bein, M. (2017). Financial reforms and determinants of FDI: evidence from landlocked countries in Sub-Saharan Africa. Economies, 5(1), 1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/economies5010001
Sangaiah, A. K., Gopal, J., Basu, A., & Subramaniam, P. R. (2017). An integrated fuzzy DEMATEL, TOPSIS, and ELECTRE approach for evaluating knowledge transfer effectiveness with reference to GSD project outcome. Neural Computing and Applications, 28(1), 111–123. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-015-2040-7
Secundo, G., De Beer, C., Schutte, C. S., & Passiante, G. (2017). Mobilizing intellectual capital to improve European universities’ competitiveness: The technology transfer offices’ role. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 18(3), 607–624. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-12-2016-0139
Shmeleva, N., Gamidullaeva, L., Tolstykh, T., & Lazarenko, D. (2021). Challenges and Opportunities for Technology Transfer Networks in the Context of Open Innovation: Russian Experience. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 7(3), 197. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc7030197
Stepanova, V. (2020). An Insight into Concepts of Technology Transfer and Its Role in the National Innovation System of Latvia. In Y. Baghdadi, A. Harfouche, & M. Musso (Eds.),ICT for an Inclusive World (pp. 251–261). Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34269-2_18
Sutopo, W., Khofiyah, N. A., Hisjam, M., & Ma’aram, A. (2022). Performance Efficiency Measurement Model Development of a Technology Transfer Office (TTO) to Accelerate Technology Commercialization in Universities. Applied System Innovation, 5(1), 21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/asi5010021
Terán-Bustamante, A., Martínez-Velasco, A., & López-Fernández, A. M. (2021). University & Industry Collaboration: A Sustainable Technology Transfer Model. Administrative Sciences, 11(4), 142. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci11040142
Van Horne, C., & Dutot, V. (2017). Challenges in technology transfer: an actor perspective in a quadruple helix environment. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 42(2), 285–301. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-016-9503-6
Weckowska, D. M. (2015). Learning in university technology transfer offices: Transactions-focused and relations-focused approaches to commercialization of academic research. Technovation, 41, 62–74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2014.11.003
Zhang, Y., Rao, X., & Wang, H. H. (2019). Organization, technology and management innovations through acquisition in China’s pork value chains: The case of the Smithfield acquisition by Shuanghui. Food policy, 83, 337–345. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2017.08.004